Monday 25 February 2008 10:55:29 pm
Hi, The xmlwash extension is just a wrapper around another external library, hence when you compared it to your library providing a long list of your extra features, I thought you just replied randomly (still not convinced you looked long at it before judging what features one had and the other didn't). Beside that, that's probably a few lines modification to integrate your library into it, and it seems indeed to handle some things better. If one is willing to dig into it, feel free ;) As for my tone, I was trying to be more ironic than cynical ;) I suspect I read your post while having the "pleasure" to browse a forum full of random posts promoting various soft. Sorry, it looks I throw the stone in the wrong direction. And that's not because I've been un needingly aggressive that I should hide it by deleting this thread. X+
http://www.sydesy.com
|